The Notting Hill Carnival highlights the need for smarter physical security says Richard Ellis, Managing Director at ATG Access
The decision to temporarily remove the concrete barriers along Portobello Road ahead of the Notting Hill Carnival highlights a recurring challenge in urban security planning. Knowing how to protect people without compromising the very spirit of the spaces we are trying to safeguard.
Portobello Road is one of London’s most vibrant and historically significant streets. Installing rows of concrete blocks along its junctions may have been a quick response to counter-terrorism guidance, but they have drawn criticism from residents and traders who feel “imprisoned” by their presence. This reaction is understandable. The installation of hostile vehicle mitigation measures should never create a fortress mentality or undermine the character and daily life of a community.
Notting Hill Carnival attracts close to two million people, making it one of the largest outdoor events in the world. Events of this scale absolutely need robust protection against the evolving threat of vehicle attacks. However, the measures chosen must be appropriate, not only in terms of security effectiveness but also in how they interact with the public realm. Barriers that restrict pedestrian flow, hinder emergency services, or visually dominate the streetscape risk eroding public trust and goodwill.
We have long stressed that design and product selection are critical. With the right approach, it is possible to secure a site effectively while still enabling the free movement of people, supporting local businesses, and respecting the cultural identity of the space. Temporary, flexible, and unobtrusive solutions exist that can provide world-class protection without leaving communities feeling cut off. True success lies in security that is intelligent, proportionate, and seamlessly integrated into its surroundings.
The current situation is a reminder that rushed or overly blunt approaches to security can do more harm than good. This situation should be learned from if we are to protect both people and places in a way that enhances, rather than diminishes, the public realm.
